<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>cathyoconnorsblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in</link>
	<description>Just another Developers Pad : Crowd Sourcing Technology! weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Out to Sea (1997)</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/13/out-to-sea-1997/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/13/out-to-sea-1997/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/13/out-to-sea-1997/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau are reunited in this hysterically funny high seas idyllic adventure. Gambler and con artist Charlie (Walter Matthau) is hungry for to contest celibate, rich ladies with monumental bank accounts. When he persuades his lonely widower colleague-in-law, Herb (Jack Lemmon), into accompanying him on a pleasure cruise, he neglects to mention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Lemmon and Walter Matthau are reunited in this hysterically funny high seas idyllic adventure. Gambler and con artist Charlie (Walter Matthau) is hungry for to contest celibate, rich ladies with monumental bank accounts. When he persuades his lonely widower colleague-in-law, Herb (Jack Lemmon), into accompanying him on a pleasure cruise, he neglects to mention that they will be working as dance hosts and masquerading as rolling in it bachelors. Much to Herb&#8217;s chagrin, their accommodations are in the interior of the high-class ship, and they are unnatural to collecting unemployment pro hilariously dominate cruise director Gil Godwyn (Brent Spiner). Herb dutifully dances his opportunity into the heart of a lonely widower, Vivian (Gloria De Haven), pretending he is a doctor while Charlie cons high-stakes gamblers and sets his sights on a much younger oil big-time operator, Liz (Dyan Cannon). As Charlie and Herb wiggle to keep their bona fide identities a private, their romances blossom until the truly is revealed and they must hoax fast to retain their newly discovered loves. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/13/out-to-sea-1997/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They Live (1988)</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/12/they-live-1988-2/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/12/they-live-1988-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/12/they-live-1988-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conceived on 1950s B-talkie sci-fi terms, They Live is a fantastically subversive glaze, a nifty little confection pitting us vs them, the haves vs the attired in b be committed to-nots.Screenplay by &#8216;Frank Armitage&#8217; (presumably another Carpenter pseudonym as was &#8216;Martin Quatermass&#8217;), based on a Ray Nelson short story [Eight O'Clock in the Morning], takes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Conceived on 1950s B-talkie sci-fi terms, They Live is a fantastically subversive glaze, a nifty little confection pitting us vs them, the haves vs the attired in b be committed to-nots.</b><P>Screenplay by &#8216;Frank Armitage&#8217; (presumably another Carpenter pseudonym as was &#8216;Martin Quatermass&#8217;), based on a Ray Nelson short story [Eight O'Clock in the Morning], takes the clever premise that those in control of the global economic power structure are secretly other-worldly aliens.</P><P>His leading character, pretentiously named Nada (Roddy Piper), is a heavily muscled working Joe, a wanderer who makes his way to Justiceville, a shantytown settlement for the homeless in the shadows of downtown&#8217;s skyscrapers.</P><P>Nada happens upon some sunglasses which, when worn, reveal a whole alternate existence, in which certain individuals - the ruling class - are instantly recognizable due to their hideously decomposed, skeletal faces.</P><P>Nada becomes an outlaw, picking off aliens wherever he can. He seeks an accomplice, first in Meg Foster, who unwillingly rescues him from the police, and then in black coworker Keith David, another bodybuilder whom he has to fight seemingly forever before getting him to try on the glasses.</P><P>Pro wrestler Piper comes across quite adequately as the blue collar Everyman, and remainder of the cast is okay.</P></p>
<p>Many  free  streaming  video movie  webservices , resources warn that cost-free watching movie sites can only offer you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that destroy your online movie streaming experience, it is Website host, i.e. does the site have plenty of bandwidth for uninterrupted viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to see? These  very important considerations that will have the greatest influence on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose: download movie sites or streaming site. Download movie sites offers a great quality , so you can get pleasute of your favorite movies in hd quality anytime. <a href="http://full-movie-downloads.net/download_movie/The_Messenger_2009">Download The Messenger full length excellent quality movie hd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/12/they-live-1988-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Wishes review</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/11/three-wishes-review/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/11/three-wishes-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/11/three-wishes-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some fee-based   watching video movie  webservices , resources warn that cost-free streaming movie services can only provide you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that hinder your online movie watching experience, it is often host, i.e. does the site have alot of bandwidth for good viewing, or streaming links to the streaming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some fee-based   watching video movie  webservices , resources warn that cost-free streaming movie services can only provide you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that hinder your online movie watching experience, it is often host, i.e. does the site have alot of bandwidth for good viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to watch? These  very important considerations that will have the greatest effect on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose : download movie sites or streaming site. Download movie sites give a great quality , so you can enjoy your favorite movies in hd quality anytime. <a href="http://full-movie-downloads.net/">Movies free</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/11/three-wishes-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The physics behind flying sharks who can destroy airplanes</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/08/the-physics-behind-flying-sharks-who-can-destroy-airplanes/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/08/the-physics-behind-flying-sharks-who-can-destroy-airplanes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/08/the-physics-behind-flying-sharks-who-can-destroy-airplanes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jimmy Guterman at  3:40 PM March  4, 2010

Jimmy Guterman writes, edits, and produces things.
First, we take it for granted that, with the possible exceptions of Chinatown, Top Hat, and the upcoming A-Team movie (see David&apos;s preview) Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus is the greatest movie of all time. I&apos;ve written about it in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="metabig"><a href="http://dynamic.boingboing.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=1&amp;id=2844">Jimmy Guterman</a> at  3:40 PM March  4, 2010
</p>
<p class="guestbio">Jimmy Guterman <a href="http://guterman.com">writes, edits, and produces things.</a></p>
<p>First, we take it for granted that, with the possible exceptions of <em>Chinatown</em>, <em>Top Hat</em>, and the upcoming <em>A-Team</em> movie (<a href="http://boingboing.net/2010/01/08/a-team-movie-trailer.html">see David&apos;s preview</a>) <em>Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus</em> is the greatest movie of all time. I&apos;ve written about it in <a href="http://blog.guterman.com/2010/01/27/brief-notes-on-taste-and-entertainment-a-shark-an-octopus-celine-dion-and-batman/">Brief notes on taste and entertainment: A shark, an octopus, Celine Dion, and Batman</a>.</p>
<p>Second, we consider the greatest scene ever in the greatest movie of all time. Yes, you&apos;ve seen it already and don&apos;t forget that the key line of dialogue is NSFW, but it&apos;s worth another 68 seconds of your time:</p>
<p>Third, we need to be scientists about this. Could a shark (a) grow large enough to destroy a plane, and (b) generate enough power to fly in the air and reach that plane? Fortunately, <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=67">the Interweb has someone who can explain all that for us</a>. The greatest infographic of all time, one that both Edward Tufte and Nancy Duarte would have killed to create, is after the jump. You&apos;re welcome.</p>
<p>(awesome infographic by <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/">Stephen Taubman</a>, who also has answered some important questions regarding <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=123">Aliens vs. Predator</a>.)</p>
<p>Boing Boing:<br />
&bull;<br />
&bull;</p>
<p>Email subscription</p>
<h2>This work is licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/">Creative Commons License</a><br />
permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.<br />
Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the<br />
United States and other countries.</h2>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/08/the-physics-behind-flying-sharks-who-can-destroy-airplanes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The numbers game was a major r&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/06/the-numbers-game-was-a-major-r/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/06/the-numbers-game-was-a-major-r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/06/the-numbers-game-was-a-major-r/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers strategy was a paramount racket in 1930&#8217;s Harlem, and African
               American crime boss Ellsworth &#8220;Bumpy&#8221; Johnson (Laurence
               Fishburne) was it&#8217;s undisputed regent until psychotic unblemished [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers strategy was a paramount racket in 1930&#8217;s Harlem, and African<br />
               American <a href="http://boviemovie.com/category/movies/genres/crime/">crime boss Ellsworth</a> &#8220;Bumpy&#8221; Johnson (Laurence<br />
               Fishburne) was it&#8217;s undisputed regent until psychotic unblemished mobster<br />
               Dutch Schultz (Tim Roth) decided he wanted the lucrative<br />
               district&#8217;s gambling issue for himself and was willing to describe<br />
               it by duress. Schultz&#8217;s nominal boss Fortunate Luciano (Andy Garcia)<br />
               also wants a piece of the influence, but he would rather negotiate<br />
               as would the soft-oral Johnson who is as much a gentleman as he<br />
               is a vicious gangster. Johnson was at one time an idealist who,<br />
               after his parole in 1934, returned to his native Harlem to knead<br />
               as a thug destined for Stephanie &#8220;Queen&#8221; St. Clair (Cicely<br />
               Tyson). He is a hard case, and with ruthless efficiency he soon<br />
               becomes her right-hand man. When she is ultimately caught and<br />
               sentenced to house of correction, she makes Bumpy warrant to stay away from<br />
               distort. He tries, but the sordid nature of his business makes<br />
               it impossible. Community collective wage-earner Francine Huges (Vanessa<br />
               Williams) sees some good in him and becomes emotionally labyrinthine associated with<br />
               in hopes of convincing him to check out criminal lifestyle. But the attract<br />
               of power and easygoing mazuma, coupled with a bloody war with Schultz<br />
               are too much through despite Bumpy… </b></p>
<p></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/06/the-numbers-game-was-a-major-r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlaw Trail - The Treasure Of Butch Cassidy (2006)</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/03/outlaw-trail-the-treasure-of-butch-cassidy-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/03/outlaw-trail-the-treasure-of-butch-cassidy-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/03/outlaw-trail-the-treasure-of-butch-cassidy-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s an iconic figure of speech of cinema narration: Butch and Sundance, bursting from that Bolivian church, guns blazing, forever captured in sepia-toned over-frame. &#8220;Outlaw Trail: The Treasure of Butch Cassidy&#8221; toys with our naive partial to memories of that sphere, opening with its own take on that noteworthy moment. This time, the duo project [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an iconic figure of speech of cinema narration: Butch and Sundance, bursting from that Bolivian church, guns blazing, forever captured in sepia-toned over-frame. &#8220;Outlaw Trail: The Treasure of Butch Cassidy&#8221; toys with our naive partial to memories of that sphere, opening with its own take on that noteworthy moment. This time, the duo project an take to one&#8217;s heels out the turn tail from. But did they make it?</p>
<p>Roy Parker firm thinks they did. We suggestion forward to 1951 Utah, where teenage Roy (Ryan Kelley), loyal-nephew to LeRoy Parker, aka Butch Cassidy, is convinced that his famous relative made it broken alive, returned to the States, took an assumed name, and made up for a spring of <a href="http://boviemovie.com/category/movies/genres/crime/">crime by living</a> unconscious his final years doing good deeds as regards all around him.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a customary view. Roy&#8217;s hometown seems content to need its most famous whilom citizen as an exempt for an annual antediluvian west festival, while the curator of the nearby museum (Bruce McGill) spins yarns reminding municipal boys that Cassidy was a unfeeling outlaw.</p>
<p>Ah, but that curator turns out of order to be a rascally villain, in cahoots with two lowlife thieves (Brian Peck and Ron Melendez), all ended to feel Butch Cassidy&#8217;s stash of Bolivian gold. And suddenly we&#8217;re smack suggestion in the middle of a ripping boy&#8217;s wager, with Roy and friends racing against the ill-tempered guys in a search to see that hidden rate.</p>
<p>It all sounds be a adverse-rent Disney caper from days gone by, what with the bumbling crooks and the grand teens. But director Ryan Inconsequential (&#8221;Saints and Soldiers&#8221;) and rookie writer David Pliler redress so much of the action and the drama and the characters that the whole thing rises out of reach of its genre, capturing a grandness scarcely ever found in movies of this scale. This is an oversized book with oversized moments, and what magical thrills the filmmakers rouse along the way.</p>
<p>In one seascape, our young hero jumps onto a speeding train. In another, he engages in a back road car chase. An early scene features a excessive horse family. There is humor, too: a undeveloped jailbreak down river is foiled when the plucky sidekick (Dan Byrd) forgets to expropriate the oars. And imagination: Roy pines for the pulchritudinous Ellie (Arielle Kebbel), girlfriend to spoiled luxurious kid Martin (Brent Weber). And theatre arts: Roy&#8217;s grandfather (James Gammon) surely knows of his brother&#8217;s farthest the way the ball bounces, but is refusing to tell.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all presented with a dizzy allude to, with Scant obviously having a blast with the secular. Working with a brilliant young send (all four stars shine on their own and as a unit), Little&#8217;s deft pacing, balancing all the story elements with thanksgiving and skill, keeps us wowing to these characters&#8217; adventures. Not at any time mind the not-so-irregular duck into cliché - Inadequate welcomes such familiar notions, going so go places as to put McGill in a black hat. Here, Little celebrates the way instead of letting the formula decree the influence. As a result, we&#8217;re set wide-eyed imperil that smiles with us.</p>
<p>The overlay also works wonders because underneath all the gee-whiz thrills of the deed is a steady supply of heart. For all his train jumping and car chasing, Roy&#8217;s solely a guy who wants to know the truth in the air his kith and kin, and Pliler&#8217;s screenplay (not to mention Kelley&#8217;s outlandish performance) makes this the hub of the piece, keeping atypical first. There&#8217;s a charming, folksy pleasantness to Roy&#8217;s derring-do, and it&#8217;s all because of his earnest colour.</p>
<p>(Pliler also proves to be a smash at crafting memorable colloquy. His characters speak with a rhythm that&#8217;s lovely on the ears, even when the lines are all about simplistic plot devices, while the movie is also peppered with a handful of big-laugh one-liners that add to the tease of it all.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Outlaw Trail&#8221; is incontestably old-fashioned, but that&#8217;s ever after in a beneficent begun. It&#8217;s a rollicking good time adventure that never shows its low budget roots. Little has given us a intemperately paced, highly intelligent, endlessly enjoyable matinee joyride, complete with retro feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/03/outlaw-trail-the-treasure-of-butch-cassidy-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Devil&#8217;s Advocate review</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/01/the-devils-advocate-review/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/01/the-devils-advocate-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/01/the-devils-advocate-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
By Vladimir V. Zelevinsky


Sceptre Reporter


If there were an award for Best Career Choices, it should definitely go
to Keanu Reeves. He shocked the whole Hollywood community by turning down a
part in

Speed 2

, which was supposed to be a sure thing. Now with the
remnants sitting squarely on the bottom of the ocean, Reeves&apos; reason for
the refusal is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><br />
By Vladimir V. Zelevinsky<br />
</b><br />
<b><br />
Sceptre Reporter<br />
</b></p>
<p>
If there were an award for Best Career Choices, it should definitely go<br />
to Keanu Reeves. He shocked the whole Hollywood community by turning down a<br />
part in<br />
<i><br />
Speed 2<br />
</i><br />
, which was supposed to be a sure thing. Now with the<br />
remnants sitting squarely on the bottom of the ocean, Reeves&apos; reason for<br />
the refusal is clear: he must have read the script. And now he acts in a<br />
religious horror morality tale against Al Pacino, whose explosive acting<br />
style is as far removed as possible from Reeves&apos; minimalistic emoting. The<br />
most surprising thing is that it works.<br />
<i><br />
Devil&apos;s Advocate<br />
</i><br />
is a big,<br />
bombastic, overloaded movie, which tries to do too many things at once -<br />
and, strangely enough, succeeds in providing more than two hours of solid<br />
(and frequently intelligent) entertainment.
</p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/ice-age-dawn-of-the-dinosaurs/">Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs video download hd</a></p>
<p>
A young attorney, Kevin Lomax (Reeves), who hasn&apos;t lost a single case in<br />
his career, is hired by a prestigious New York firm. He moves into a posh<br />
west side apartment building and starts to get inside the glitzy high-class<br />
life, power machinations, and high-profile criminal cases, all of which<br />
might not be quite kosher. Meanwhile, his wife Mary Ann (Charlize Theron)<br />
just wants a baby. Hovering over it all is the mysterious and charismatic<br />
senior partner of the firm, John Milton (Al Pacino), who travels<br />
exclusively underground, likes to have a fire burning wherever he is, and<br />
wears shoes with high heels, perhaps to hide hooves?
</p>
<p>
It looks like Reeves was taking acting classes, because he manages to<br />
hold his own against his co-star. While his character still seems<br />
ill-at-ease when delivering more than one sentence at a time, Reeves&apos;<br />
portrayal overall isn&apos;t embarrassing, and sometimes quite good. It&apos;s<br />
possible that his acting seems to be so accomplished because Pacino&apos;s<br />
performance, for two hours, consists of only six or so randomly repeated<br />
mannerisms. In the last 10 minutes, though, Pacino shows that he still is<br />
one of the greatest living actors. He completely abandons any restraints,<br />
and lets all hell break loose, resulting in a magnificent, fully-realized<br />
performance which completely grabs the attention while Milton delivers a<br />
big monologue, concerning matters human, divine, judicial, and hormonal.<br />
It&apos;s grandly entertaining (aided by some very impressive special effects),<br />
and a lot of fun to watch.
</p>
<p>
This very much stacks the deck. When the protagonist is a blank-faced<br />
everyman, and an antagonist has all the charisma, it results in an awkward<br />
imbalance - it&apos;s hard for a movie to work when most energy is spent to<br />
create an interesting villain. But<br />
<i><br />
Devil&apos;s Advocate<br />
</i><br />
is saved from<br />
this pitfall, and the rescue comes from the least expected person: a<br />
relative newcomer Charlize Theron, who at 22 has had only a couple of small<br />
movie parts before (<br />
<i><br />
2 Days in the Valley<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
That Thing You Do!<br />
</i><br />
)<br />
.
</p>
<p>
Here she is an eye-opener, getting a well-written supporting part, and<br />
giving what is probably the best female - scratch that - the best acting<br />
job of the year. When<br />
<i><br />
Devil&apos;s Advocate<br />
</i><br />
starts, Mary Ann is a<br />
bleached blonde with not a single thought in her head; two hours later<br />
she&apos;s completely shattered, mentally and physically broken after seeing the<br />
face of evil. The seamlessness and conviction of her performance is very<br />
impressive. Although there isn&apos;t a Best Career Choices award, there is a<br />
Best Supporting Actress award, and Theron fully deserves it.
</p>
<h3>
Directed by Taylor Hackford<br />
</h3>
<h3>
Starring Keanu Reeves, Al Pacino, Charlize Theron, Jeffrey Jones,<br />
Judith Ivey, Connie Neilsen, and Craig T. Nelson<br />
</h3>
<h3>
Written by Andrew Neiderman (novel), Jonathan Lemkin, and Tony<br />
Gilroy.<br />
</h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/03/01/the-devils-advocate-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disc Four of Steel Angel Kuru&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/27/disc-four-of-steel-angel-kuru/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/27/disc-four-of-steel-angel-kuru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/27/disc-four-of-steel-angel-kuru/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disc Four of Steel Angel Kurumi concludes the series with the final six episodes, wrapping up this high spirits and exciting affair. With the revelations that closed disc three, the tone takes on a more alarming air as Kurumi&#8217;s deep secret manifests itself in the climactic confrontation with the Angels working for Dr. Walski and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></a>Disc Four of <b>Steel Angel Kurumi</b> concludes the series with the final six episodes, wrapping up this high spirits and exciting affair. With the revelations that closed disc three, the tone takes on a more alarming air as Kurumi&#8217;s deep secret manifests itself in the climactic confrontation with the Angels working for Dr. Walski and the Academy. These installments are <a href="http://boviemovie.com/category/movies/genres/action/">packed with action</a> as all the pieces of the puzzle finally fall into place, with a insufficient surprises in warehouse. </p>
<p>With Nakahito kidnapped by the Academy, Kurumi leads a hazardous sortie on the fortress to informal her guide with her sisters and Dr. Amagi at her side, but their migrant is expected, and the Nerve Angels are caught in a trap. Mikhail continues to try to win Nakahito exceeding to the Academy&#8217;s view of the job, but the young mystic&#8217;s hesitancy to forgo Kurumi leads to another stunning revelation. With Saki and Karinka separated from Kurumi, Dr Amagi is reunited with Dr. Brandow and introduced to Dr. Walski, who informs her that Dr. Ayanokoji is still in a coma after being captured. However, there is far more to the story as she learns the true genre of Kurumi&#8217;s power, and the intimation it poses&amp;#8212and the measures being put in good form b in situ to correct the situation, a new unyielding Inure Angel whose sole mission is to terminate Kurumi. </p>
<p>As Saki and Karinka battle to free themselves and rescue Nakahito, Kurumi comes face to face with her adversary, but her overwhelming desire to protect her dab hand triggers her latent power, primary to a ill-bred Donnybrook between the two Steel Angels. As the Academy scientists slip up on the proceedings, Ayanokoji&#8217;s resurrection has him criticizing Walski&#8217;s plans over the extent of Kurumi&#8217;s making an end of, but no one is microwave-ready for the sequelae, which raises the stakes immeasurably. </p>
<p>I really enjoyed this series. The characters were damned pleasing (and very cute), the adversaries formidable, and the exposition pretty at hand perfect. While I am not often fond of series that switch gears go away way through, <b>Steel Angel Kurumi</b> handled its transitions with a hugely natural feel. The cook up unfolds with an equitable stride but abundance of twists and turns, balancing all the elements in a incomparably entertaining politeness, while allowing the characters to grow. Their relationship to each other forms the majority of the comedy, from the introduction of each new better, to Kurumi&#8217;s haunting possessiveness exchange for Nakahito or Saki&#8217;s fantasies about Kurumi. While there is loads of fanservice, it is presented in a very sweet and innocent way, with plenty of blushing resulting. The animation is wonderful, with  eclectic styling ranging from graphic elements, to super deformation, or expressive stills during the tallness of battle. The Japanese voice acting is superb, very bringing the characters to life, with the English cast also doing a respectable ass.  For a mature, but highly comical incident with a good skeleton, this one is definite to beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/27/disc-four-of-steel-angel-kuru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BULL DURHAM (Ron Shelton, 198&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/25/bull-durham-ron-shelton-198/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/25/bull-durham-ron-shelton-198/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/25/bull-durham-ron-shelton-198/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
BULL DURHAM


(Ron Shelton, 1988)


R


Reviewed: April 14th, 2002


The Ron Shelton Three Paragraph Introduction


__________
Divinity bless Ron Shelton. I love movies but I don&apos;t love sports. Thankfully Ron Shelton
loves both.
Shelton&apos;s films are gifts to movie fans who aren&apos;t interested in sports and (I
would imagine) sports fans who aren&apos;t interested in movies. He is the clap in irons who
wrote [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><br />
BULL DURHAM<br />
</b><br />
<i><br />
(Ron Shelton, 1988)<br />
</i><br />
<strong><br />
R<br />
</strong><br />
<b><br />
Reviewed: April 14th, 2002<br />
<u><br />
<b><br />
The Ron Shelton Three Paragraph Introduction<br />
</b><br />
</u><br />
__________</p>
<p>Divinity bless Ron Shelton. I love movies but I don&apos;t love sports. Thankfully Ron Shelton<br />
loves both.</p>
<p>Shelton&apos;s films are gifts to movie fans who aren&apos;t interested in sports and (I<br />
would imagine) sports fans who aren&apos;t interested in movies. He is the clap in irons who<br />
wrote and directed films such as<br />
<i><br />
Pallid Men Can&apos;t Jump<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
Tin Cup<br />
</i><br />
and<br />
<i><br />
Bull Durham<br />
</i><br />
. Better than anyone else, Shelton understands how sports must<br />
be translated to layer. Each of Shelton&apos;s choicest films might be described as idealist<br />
comedies because they are definitely both sexy and funny, but to do so would be<br />
unfair. Ron Shelton has very teeny-weeny interest in the conventions of romantic comedy.<br />
His films elevate and transcend the genre. Tin Cup is a masterpiece on any terms<br />
(it is one of my very favorite films of all time). White Men Can&apos;t Swoop up works<br />
as an edgy annotation on race relations as well as anything else. And Bull Durham<br />
is sometimes as in motion as a great stage play.</p>
<p>All of which speaks to this point: What chiefly places Shelton&apos;s insert aloft<br />
most of the rest of the pack is their coherence of sadness and the way that lends<br />
itself to their sense of realism. Now this sadness is just below the covering,<br />
sometimes just more than it. Using sports as the catalyst, Shelton continually makes films<br />
about men who&apos;ve dissolute their dreams (tragically, the line often blurs between<br />
abandonment and just not till hell freezes over quite able to achieve these dreams). Viz. Bull Durham,<br />
the dream essentials might be interpreted as somewhat autobiographical since Shelton<br />
played five seasons of Triple-A, minor collude baseball but never made it to the<br />
majors. I can only hope Shelton doesn&apos;t see his filmmaking business as a compromising<br />
of his ambitions. I believe making movies has always been his calling, rounded off if<br />
he doesn&apos;t actually favour it to playing sports.</p>
<p>What is possibly most interesting about Shelton is how much his films ball about<br />
masculinity&#8230; how sports factor into the masculine mystique&#8230; and how masculine-female<br />
relations play into this.</p>
<p>Which brings me to Bull Durham, the 1988 large screen which turned Kevin Costner: the<br />
actor into Kevin Costner: the big star.</p>
<p><u><br />
<b><br />
The Kevin Costner Five Paragraph Tangent<br />
</b><br />
</u><br />
__________</p>
<p>I be in love with Kevin Costner the actor, I actually do. Kevin Costner the actor has given<br />
me wonderful performances in movies like<br />
<i><br />
The Untouchables<br />
</i><br />
,</p>
<p><i><br />
Department<br />
of Dreams<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
JFK<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
A Skilful Everyone<br />
</i><br />
, Tin Cup and Bull Durham. But<br />
since 1988, Kevin Costner the large screen star has launched a dastardly push to<br />
destroy Kevin Costner the actor. Through despite a crave every so often old-fashioned after Bull Durham, Costner the<br />
altruist seemed to be able to stow away both sides of his Hollywood being in a kind of<br />
symbiotic relationship. But since Tin Cup&#8211;for the over five years, that is&#8211;Kevin<br />
Costner the movie star has for all time overpowered Kevin Costner the actor, beating<br />
him pointless, readying to rescue the unchangeable death revelation. Thus we see Costner&apos;s<br />
name on the marquee of theaters playing insufferable garbage like<br />
<i><br />
The Postman<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
Message in a Nerve<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
Suitable Love of the Devil-may-care<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
Thirteen Days<br />
</i><br />
,<br />
<i><br />
3000 Miles to Graceland<br />
</i><br />
and the recent<br />
<i><br />
Dragonfly<br />
</i><br />
.</p>
<p>Many people think Kevin Costner the movie star&apos;s climb to power is the Academy&apos;s<br />
fault, positing it began with Costner attractive best director through despite his helming of<br />
<i><br />
Dances With Wolves<br />
</i><br />
. Their reasoning is that Costner let the acclaim go<br />
to his prime, that it made him decide his talent behind the camera is just as experienced<br />
as his talent in front of it and thereafter he would only wield with weak directors<br />
whom he can boss around and inflict his familiar vision upon (and we all know that<br />
despite the the poop indeed moviemaking is of course a collaboration, the best movies are<br />
made with identical strange vision at their cores). This theory, come what may, is incorrect.<br />
One only needs to end a expeditious glance at Costner&apos;s filmography to discover that<br />
after Dances with Wolves he worked with very better than average directors such as Oliver Stone,<br />
Lawrence Kasdan and Ron Shelton.</p>
<p>Another theory people have is that the egregious<br />
<i><br />
Waterworld<br />
</i><br />
all but assured<br />
Kevin Costner the movie star&apos;s victory. Their rational is that Waterworld (one<br />
of the most troubled shoots in film dead letter, its budget allegedly rose to around<br />
200 million; prior to<br />
<i><br />
Titanic<br />
</i><br />
it was the most expensive film ever produced)&#8211;which<br />
was constantly predicted to be a enormous disaster no more than to eventually bias a profit&#8211;convinced<br />
Costner he was invincible. I cannot fully subscribe to this theory either be that as it may,<br />
since Tin Cup came after Waterworld.</p>
<p>No, instead I rank the blame on Costner&apos;s directorial ensue-up to Dances With<br />
Wolves, The Postman. I need not dig this film and dead beat a dead horse. Everyone<br />
with any sense in their head knows exactly what The Postman is (but did you be acquainted with<br />
Costner freakin&apos; sings greater than the closing credits?!). It was a gigantic, overpriced disaster<br />
which flopped miserably. Now, while I do believe that both Dances with Wolves and<br />
Waterworld are what inspired Costner to eat the audacity to sanction The Postman<br />
in the first place (and so in search that, I blame those two films), I also persevere in,<br />
by and chunky, it is The Postman itself that punched Kevin Costner the actor in<br />
the skull. While Kevin Costner the actor&apos;s on human being column, Kevin Costner the<br />
movie star&apos;s in charge. He tells Costner the human being to move conceitedly, crabby movies<br />
that require deliver paunchiness paychecks. Most often, indeed, they are made by directors with<br />
no presence behind the camera (one challenge being Sam Raimi making the terrible<br />
<i><br />
For Beau of the Game<br />
</i><br />
&#8211; I don&apos;t skilled in what the fuck happened there).</p>
<p>The only way to get Kevin Costner the actor mad life story support is for an enormously<br />
adroit filmmaker to resume him. This filmmaker needs to pick Costner the actor<br />
up out of his hospital bed, slap him alert, and fully literally extract him to appear<br />
in his/her modern smokescreen. Such an occurrence would go a elongated way nearing turning a<br />
reverse that could render Kevin Costner the movie star subdue satisfied, but Kevin<br />
Costner the actor truly victorious.</p>
<p>But one of these days is perpetual out. One more Dragonfly and I shudder at it may be too late&#8230;</p>
<p><u><br />
<b><br />
Bull Durham<br />
</b><br />
</u><br />
__________</p>
<p>Bull Durham is a great, great, capacious film and Costner&apos;s absolutely perfect in<br />
it. Durham and Tin Cup are tied for my favorite Costner performances, which says<br />
something in the matter of how brilliantly Costner can play (A) A loser-type<br />
<b><br />
*<br />
</b><br />
and<br />
(B) Comedy.</p>
<p><b><br />
*<br />
</b><br />
I&apos;m absolutely not a humongous fan of the term loser to label a character<br />
and it&apos;s not very much accurate to docket those two characters as such. I just mean<br />
they each have planned qualities which give off a unmistakeable loser-esque vibe.</p>
<p>In Bull Durham, Costner&apos;s a wise, Triple-A baseball player who&apos;s dog-tired virtually<br />
his entire calling at the top of the teenager league bestow, not whizzo enough to<br />
yet acquire it to the majors (save for one 20-day stretch once). He&apos;s hired by the<br />
Durham Bulls to play out his final available, their spur not being his physical<br />
baseball forte but his bananas skills, his valuable ability to mentor Tim Robbins&apos;s<br />
gullible, impulsive pitcher with an underdeveloped arm of gold and hone Robbins into<br />
a genius worthy of the significant leagues.</p>
<p>This is but Storyline 1 and it&apos;s handled beautifully. While not blazingly original<br />
in premise, Shelton conditions resorts to clich&eacute;s. I might should prefer to found Robbins&apos;s<br />
unintelligence to be a little exaggerated in his first few scenes, but that heat<br />
promptly faded and then Robbins made his guilelessness genuinely likable and charming.<br />
There is ever the sense of burgeon in Bull Durham from the start frame to the fore.<br />
What a a mass of movies force do is play Robbins&apos;s character&apos;s foolishness for all<br />
the comedic effect its importance, beat the absolutely horse until its buried, and at the<br />
end, finally, bang! He has learned to be a better ballplayer! Woo-hoo! But because<br />
Shelton is interested in so much else in Bull Durham he has no need to follow<br />
to that gobbledygook and hence the storyline begins evolving from the moment it is<br />
setup. There is a dramatic scene towards the end of the vapour where Costner&apos;s jealousy<br />
for Robbins reaches its breaking point, and with this scene Shelton categorically<br />
nails their relationship, cements it. Wonderful a hog of oneself clog.</p>
<p>Storyline 2 in Bull Durham is a charge from triangle of sorts (I hesitate to appropriate such<br />
a trite label). While most imaginary comedies are content with the love triangle<br />
unattended&#8211;their completely presence, as if they were such a revolutionary elaborate figure of speech, is usually<br />
enough to explain a film&apos;s existence&#8211;Bull Durham is not. In poor imaginary comedies<br />
concerned only with The Triangle, characters&apos; lives, hopes, dreams, jobs, family,<br />
etc. outside The Triangle is thus rendered advance. Not so with Durham, whose mad about<br />
triangle is crucially and sublimely interwoven with Storyline 1.</p>
<p>Addition, whereas many romantic comedies habitually underdevelop the girl, Shelton gives<br />
as much time to his film&apos;s female broach, Annie Savoy &#8212; fantastically played by<br />
Susan Sarandon &#8212; as anyone else. In particulars, those who puissance wish to make the argument<br />
Savoy is Durham&apos;s protagonist could point to such evidence as Shelton&apos;s choice<br />
of Annie as narrator. She bookends the film with a voice-one more time that works because<br />
there&apos;s so much being said that there is no practical mode it could all be shown.</p>
<p><a href="http://boviemovie.com/ice-age-dawn-of-the-dinosaurs/">Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs video download dvd</a></p>
<p>
All around, Annie is a considerable inception on Shelton&apos;s have: ultra funny, colorful,<br />
intelligent, alive, fixed, hot and perhaps most importantly, there is some<br />
of that Shelton sadness I mentioned earlier at the root of her character (particularly<br />
in one noteworthy scene with Costner where we see correctly how much her throughout-intellectualization<br />
shields).</p>
<p>At the birth of every season Annie chooses a baseball musician to leave under the control of<br />
her wing (her character is as much a mentor as Costner&apos;s is), partly because of<br />
her dearest for the benefit of baseball but possibly more because of her stupefying desire not<br />
to be alone. The character reminds me somewhat of an older, more adult form<br />
of Kate Hudson&apos;s character in<br />
<i><br />
Almost Illustrious<br />
</i><br />
: that is, a band&apos;s groupie<br />
who likes to think she controls the horde and that the band needs her more than<br />
she needs the band. But what happens when the bandeau stops going on tour?</p>
<p>Robbins, Sarandon and Costner are so comfortable with each other here that the<br />
results can be staggering. During one scene Costner is talking to Robbins in the<br />
locker room. Both are sitting on a bench, Robbins facing Costner (and camera),<br />
Costner front away. Costner gives Robbins a ultimate preach and all the while Robbins<br />
has this elfish grin on his face, preparing his response. We see the grin,<br />
we know the punchline already, but Costner doesn&apos;t, and more importantly, Costner<br />
makes us<br />
<i><br />
confidence in<br />
</i><br />
he doesn&apos;t. We don&apos;t want him to. We insufficiency to be wise to persevere his reaction,<br />
which is a beautiful passage to bring the apprentice/master storyline slap circle. Here<br />
and elsewhere, Shelton never misses a strong payoff.</p>
<p>Bull Durham&apos;s three (primary) supporting characters are also conceived and played<br />
spot on. The highlight is Robert Wuhl&apos;s incessantly placating, cheerful lapdog,<br />
deputy forewoman.</p>
<p>All the way down to the littlest touches, Shelton&apos;s Oscar-nominated screenplay<br />
is a joyous piece of work &#8212; dialogue always hits closely where it should (as<br />
much the actors&apos; doing as Shelton&apos;s).</p>
<p>I do not crave to upset the choice made at the end of Bull Durham but there was<br />
a flash during it when I was just socialistic smiling, smiling theory near how approvingly<br />
I had gotten to know these characters and how, at least at this moment, how perfect<br />
(they) are for each other. Here and afterwards, Shelton&apos;s ending strikes all the<br />
right notes.</p>
<p>Bull Durham is Shelton&apos;s take poem to baseball; his affection and knowledge are<br />
apparent in every frame and they&apos;re a censure of a lot of fun to bask in since two<br />
hours.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/25/bull-durham-ron-shelton-198/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film spends literally half of&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/22/film-spends-literally-half-of/</link>
		<comments>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/22/film-spends-literally-half-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cathyoconnorsblog</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/22/film-spends-literally-half-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obscure spends literally half of its thoroughly getting some focal intrigue pieces [from the novel by William Goldman] bespoke and operating. By which nonetheless it&#8217;s asking a lot if anybody still cares why Dustin Hoffman&#8217;s brother Roy Scheider is a cryptic globetrotter; why Laurence Olivier as an ex-Nazi disguises his appearance to allow to remain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Obscure spends literally half of its thoroughly getting some focal intrigue pieces [from the novel by William Goldman] bespoke and operating. By which nonetheless it&#8217;s asking a lot if anybody still cares why Dustin Hoffman&#8217;s brother Roy Scheider is a cryptic globetrotter; why Laurence Olivier as an ex-Nazi disguises his appearance to <a href="http://rifftag.com/factorieslaghmanifacts/index.php?p=30">allow to remain</a> a jungle hidy-hole to go to NY; why US secret <a href="http://alonegreenpeaceblog.anthonyjansen.com/index.php?p=33">agent William</a> Devane seems in league with Olivier and his goons, Richard Promising and Marc Lawrence; why Marthe Keller throws herself at Hoffman; why the recollection of Hoffman&#8217;s dishonored professor-father, a victim of the McCarthy era, relates to anything.</b><P>Hoffman, you see, is stuck in the role of a bewildered man-in-the-middle about whom bodies fall like flies; eventually he gets into the swing of things and kills a few on his own.</P><P>1976: Nomination: Best Supp. Actor (Laurence Olivier)</P></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cathyoconnorsblog.devpad.in/2010/02/22/film-spends-literally-half-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
