Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

They Live (1988)

Posted on the March 12th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Conceived on 1950s B-talkie sci-fi terms, They Live is a fantastically subversive glaze, a nifty little confection pitting us vs them, the haves vs the attired in b be committed to-nots.

Screenplay by ‘Frank Armitage’ (presumably another Carpenter pseudonym as was ‘Martin Quatermass’), based on a Ray Nelson short story [Eight O'Clock in the Morning], takes the clever premise that those in control of the global economic power structure are secretly other-worldly aliens.

His leading character, pretentiously named Nada (Roddy Piper), is a heavily muscled working Joe, a wanderer who makes his way to Justiceville, a shantytown settlement for the homeless in the shadows of downtown’s skyscrapers.

Nada happens upon some sunglasses which, when worn, reveal a whole alternate existence, in which certain individuals - the ruling class - are instantly recognizable due to their hideously decomposed, skeletal faces.

Nada becomes an outlaw, picking off aliens wherever he can. He seeks an accomplice, first in Meg Foster, who unwillingly rescues him from the police, and then in black coworker Keith David, another bodybuilder whom he has to fight seemingly forever before getting him to try on the glasses.

Pro wrestler Piper comes across quite adequately as the blue collar Everyman, and remainder of the cast is okay.

Many free streaming video movie webservices , resources warn that cost-free watching movie sites can only offer you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that destroy your online movie streaming experience, it is Website host, i.e. does the site have plenty of bandwidth for uninterrupted viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to see? These very important considerations that will have the greatest influence on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose: download movie sites or streaming site. Download movie sites offers a great quality , so you can get pleasute of your favorite movies in hd quality anytime. Download The Messenger full length excellent quality movie hd

Three Wishes review

Posted on the March 11th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Some fee-based watching video movie webservices , resources warn that cost-free streaming movie services can only provide you bad quality movies with annoying resolutions that hinder your online movie watching experience, it is often host, i.e. does the site have alot of bandwidth for good viewing, or streaming links to the streaming movies you want to watch? These very important considerations that will have the greatest effect on the quality of your relaxation is what you will choose : download movie sites or streaming site. Download movie sites give a great quality , so you can enjoy your favorite movies in hd quality anytime. Movies free

The physics behind flying sharks who can destroy airplanes

Posted on the March 8th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Jimmy Guterman at 3:40 PM March 4, 2010

Jimmy Guterman writes, edits, and produces things.

First, we take it for granted that, with the possible exceptions of Chinatown, Top Hat, and the upcoming A-Team movie (see David's preview) Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus is the greatest movie of all time. I've written about it in Brief notes on taste and entertainment: A shark, an octopus, Celine Dion, and Batman.

Second, we consider the greatest scene ever in the greatest movie of all time. Yes, you've seen it already and don't forget that the key line of dialogue is NSFW, but it's worth another 68 seconds of your time:

Third, we need to be scientists about this. Could a shark (a) grow large enough to destroy a plane, and (b) generate enough power to fly in the air and reach that plane? Fortunately, the Interweb has someone who can explain all that for us. The greatest infographic of all time, one that both Edward Tufte and Nancy Duarte would have killed to create, is after the jump. You're welcome.

(awesome infographic by Stephen Taubman, who also has answered some important questions regarding Aliens vs. Predator.)

Boing Boing:

Email subscription

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
Boing Boing is a trademark of Happy Mutants LLC in the
United States and other countries.

The numbers game was a major r…

Posted on the March 6th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

The numbers strategy was a paramount racket in 1930’s Harlem, and African
American crime boss Ellsworth “Bumpy” Johnson (Laurence
Fishburne) was it’s undisputed regent until psychotic unblemished mobster
Dutch Schultz (Tim Roth) decided he wanted the lucrative
district’s gambling issue for himself and was willing to describe
it by duress. Schultz’s nominal boss Fortunate Luciano (Andy Garcia)
also wants a piece of the influence, but he would rather negotiate
as would the soft-oral Johnson who is as much a gentleman as he
is a vicious gangster. Johnson was at one time an idealist who,
after his parole in 1934, returned to his native Harlem to knead
as a thug destined for Stephanie “Queen” St. Clair (Cicely
Tyson). He is a hard case, and with ruthless efficiency he soon
becomes her right-hand man. When she is ultimately caught and
sentenced to house of correction, she makes Bumpy warrant to stay away from
distort. He tries, but the sordid nature of his business makes
it impossible. Community collective wage-earner Francine Huges (Vanessa
Williams) sees some good in him and becomes emotionally labyrinthine associated with
in hopes of convincing him to check out criminal lifestyle. But the attract
of power and easygoing mazuma, coupled with a bloody war with Schultz
are too much through despite Bumpy…

Outlaw Trail - The Treasure Of Butch Cassidy (2006)

Posted on the March 3rd, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

It’s an iconic figure of speech of cinema narration: Butch and Sundance, bursting from that Bolivian church, guns blazing, forever captured in sepia-toned over-frame. “Outlaw Trail: The Treasure of Butch Cassidy” toys with our naive partial to memories of that sphere, opening with its own take on that noteworthy moment. This time, the duo project an take to one’s heels out the turn tail from. But did they make it?

Roy Parker firm thinks they did. We suggestion forward to 1951 Utah, where teenage Roy (Ryan Kelley), loyal-nephew to LeRoy Parker, aka Butch Cassidy, is convinced that his famous relative made it broken alive, returned to the States, took an assumed name, and made up for a spring of crime by living unconscious his final years doing good deeds as regards all around him.

It’s not a customary view. Roy’s hometown seems content to need its most famous whilom citizen as an exempt for an annual antediluvian west festival, while the curator of the nearby museum (Bruce McGill) spins yarns reminding municipal boys that Cassidy was a unfeeling outlaw.

Ah, but that curator turns out of order to be a rascally villain, in cahoots with two lowlife thieves (Brian Peck and Ron Melendez), all ended to feel Butch Cassidy’s stash of Bolivian gold. And suddenly we’re smack suggestion in the middle of a ripping boy’s wager, with Roy and friends racing against the ill-tempered guys in a search to see that hidden rate.

It all sounds be a adverse-rent Disney caper from days gone by, what with the bumbling crooks and the grand teens. But director Ryan Inconsequential (”Saints and Soldiers”) and rookie writer David Pliler redress so much of the action and the drama and the characters that the whole thing rises out of reach of its genre, capturing a grandness scarcely ever found in movies of this scale. This is an oversized book with oversized moments, and what magical thrills the filmmakers rouse along the way.

In one seascape, our young hero jumps onto a speeding train. In another, he engages in a back road car chase. An early scene features a excessive horse family. There is humor, too: a undeveloped jailbreak down river is foiled when the plucky sidekick (Dan Byrd) forgets to expropriate the oars. And imagination: Roy pines for the pulchritudinous Ellie (Arielle Kebbel), girlfriend to spoiled luxurious kid Martin (Brent Weber). And theatre arts: Roy’s grandfather (James Gammon) surely knows of his brother’s farthest the way the ball bounces, but is refusing to tell.

It’s all presented with a dizzy allude to, with Scant obviously having a blast with the secular. Working with a brilliant young send (all four stars shine on their own and as a unit), Little’s deft pacing, balancing all the story elements with thanksgiving and skill, keeps us wowing to these characters’ adventures. Not at any time mind the not-so-irregular duck into cliché - Inadequate welcomes such familiar notions, going so go places as to put McGill in a black hat. Here, Little celebrates the way instead of letting the formula decree the influence. As a result, we’re set wide-eyed imperil that smiles with us.

The overlay also works wonders because underneath all the gee-whiz thrills of the deed is a steady supply of heart. For all his train jumping and car chasing, Roy’s solely a guy who wants to know the truth in the air his kith and kin, and Pliler’s screenplay (not to mention Kelley’s outlandish performance) makes this the hub of the piece, keeping atypical first. There’s a charming, folksy pleasantness to Roy’s derring-do, and it’s all because of his earnest colour.

(Pliler also proves to be a smash at crafting memorable colloquy. His characters speak with a rhythm that’s lovely on the ears, even when the lines are all about simplistic plot devices, while the movie is also peppered with a handful of big-laugh one-liners that add to the tease of it all.)

“Outlaw Trail” is incontestably old-fashioned, but that’s ever after in a beneficent begun. It’s a rollicking good time adventure that never shows its low budget roots. Little has given us a intemperately paced, highly intelligent, endlessly enjoyable matinee joyride, complete with retro feel.

The Devil’s Advocate review

Posted on the March 1st, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog


By Vladimir V. Zelevinsky


Sceptre Reporter

If there were an award for Best Career Choices, it should definitely go
to Keanu Reeves. He shocked the whole Hollywood community by turning down a
part in

Speed 2

, which was supposed to be a sure thing. Now with the
remnants sitting squarely on the bottom of the ocean, Reeves' reason for
the refusal is clear: he must have read the script. And now he acts in a
religious horror morality tale against Al Pacino, whose explosive acting
style is as far removed as possible from Reeves' minimalistic emoting. The
most surprising thing is that it works.

Devil's Advocate

is a big,
bombastic, overloaded movie, which tries to do too many things at once -
and, strangely enough, succeeds in providing more than two hours of solid
(and frequently intelligent) entertainment.

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs video download hd

A young attorney, Kevin Lomax (Reeves), who hasn't lost a single case in
his career, is hired by a prestigious New York firm. He moves into a posh
west side apartment building and starts to get inside the glitzy high-class
life, power machinations, and high-profile criminal cases, all of which
might not be quite kosher. Meanwhile, his wife Mary Ann (Charlize Theron)
just wants a baby. Hovering over it all is the mysterious and charismatic
senior partner of the firm, John Milton (Al Pacino), who travels
exclusively underground, likes to have a fire burning wherever he is, and
wears shoes with high heels, perhaps to hide hooves?

It looks like Reeves was taking acting classes, because he manages to
hold his own against his co-star. While his character still seems
ill-at-ease when delivering more than one sentence at a time, Reeves'
portrayal overall isn't embarrassing, and sometimes quite good. It's
possible that his acting seems to be so accomplished because Pacino's
performance, for two hours, consists of only six or so randomly repeated
mannerisms. In the last 10 minutes, though, Pacino shows that he still is
one of the greatest living actors. He completely abandons any restraints,
and lets all hell break loose, resulting in a magnificent, fully-realized
performance which completely grabs the attention while Milton delivers a
big monologue, concerning matters human, divine, judicial, and hormonal.
It's grandly entertaining (aided by some very impressive special effects),
and a lot of fun to watch.

This very much stacks the deck. When the protagonist is a blank-faced
everyman, and an antagonist has all the charisma, it results in an awkward
imbalance - it's hard for a movie to work when most energy is spent to
create an interesting villain. But

Devil's Advocate

is saved from
this pitfall, and the rescue comes from the least expected person: a
relative newcomer Charlize Theron, who at 22 has had only a couple of small
movie parts before (

2 Days in the Valley

,

That Thing You Do!

)
.

Here she is an eye-opener, getting a well-written supporting part, and
giving what is probably the best female - scratch that - the best acting
job of the year. When

Devil's Advocate

starts, Mary Ann is a
bleached blonde with not a single thought in her head; two hours later
she's completely shattered, mentally and physically broken after seeing the
face of evil. The seamlessness and conviction of her performance is very
impressive. Although there isn't a Best Career Choices award, there is a
Best Supporting Actress award, and Theron fully deserves it.

Directed by Taylor Hackford

Starring Keanu Reeves, Al Pacino, Charlize Theron, Jeffrey Jones,
Judith Ivey, Connie Neilsen, and Craig T. Nelson

Written by Andrew Neiderman (novel), Jonathan Lemkin, and Tony
Gilroy.

Disc Four of Steel Angel Kuru…

Posted on the February 27th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Disc Four of Steel Angel Kurumi concludes the series with the final six episodes, wrapping up this high spirits and exciting affair. With the revelations that closed disc three, the tone takes on a more alarming air as Kurumi’s deep secret manifests itself in the climactic confrontation with the Angels working for Dr. Walski and the Academy. These installments are packed with action as all the pieces of the puzzle finally fall into place, with a insufficient surprises in warehouse.

With Nakahito kidnapped by the Academy, Kurumi leads a hazardous sortie on the fortress to informal her guide with her sisters and Dr. Amagi at her side, but their migrant is expected, and the Nerve Angels are caught in a trap. Mikhail continues to try to win Nakahito exceeding to the Academy’s view of the job, but the young mystic’s hesitancy to forgo Kurumi leads to another stunning revelation. With Saki and Karinka separated from Kurumi, Dr Amagi is reunited with Dr. Brandow and introduced to Dr. Walski, who informs her that Dr. Ayanokoji is still in a coma after being captured. However, there is far more to the story as she learns the true genre of Kurumi’s power, and the intimation it poses&#8212and the measures being put in good form b in situ to correct the situation, a new unyielding Inure Angel whose sole mission is to terminate Kurumi.

As Saki and Karinka battle to free themselves and rescue Nakahito, Kurumi comes face to face with her adversary, but her overwhelming desire to protect her dab hand triggers her latent power, primary to a ill-bred Donnybrook between the two Steel Angels. As the Academy scientists slip up on the proceedings, Ayanokoji’s resurrection has him criticizing Walski’s plans over the extent of Kurumi’s making an end of, but no one is microwave-ready for the sequelae, which raises the stakes immeasurably.

I really enjoyed this series. The characters were damned pleasing (and very cute), the adversaries formidable, and the exposition pretty at hand perfect. While I am not often fond of series that switch gears go away way through, Steel Angel Kurumi handled its transitions with a hugely natural feel. The cook up unfolds with an equitable stride but abundance of twists and turns, balancing all the elements in a incomparably entertaining politeness, while allowing the characters to grow. Their relationship to each other forms the majority of the comedy, from the introduction of each new better, to Kurumi’s haunting possessiveness exchange for Nakahito or Saki’s fantasies about Kurumi. While there is loads of fanservice, it is presented in a very sweet and innocent way, with plenty of blushing resulting. The animation is wonderful, with eclectic styling ranging from graphic elements, to super deformation, or expressive stills during the tallness of battle. The Japanese voice acting is superb, very bringing the characters to life, with the English cast also doing a respectable ass. For a mature, but highly comical incident with a good skeleton, this one is definite to beat.

BULL DURHAM (Ron Shelton, 198…

Posted on the February 25th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog


BULL DURHAM


(Ron Shelton, 1988)


R


Reviewed: April 14th, 2002


The Ron Shelton Three Paragraph Introduction


__________

Divinity bless Ron Shelton. I love movies but I don't love sports. Thankfully Ron Shelton
loves both.

Shelton's films are gifts to movie fans who aren't interested in sports and (I
would imagine) sports fans who aren't interested in movies. He is the clap in irons who
wrote and directed films such as

Pallid Men Can't Jump

,

Tin Cup

and

Bull Durham

. Better than anyone else, Shelton understands how sports must
be translated to layer. Each of Shelton's choicest films might be described as idealist
comedies because they are definitely both sexy and funny, but to do so would be
unfair. Ron Shelton has very teeny-weeny interest in the conventions of romantic comedy.
His films elevate and transcend the genre. Tin Cup is a masterpiece on any terms
(it is one of my very favorite films of all time). White Men Can't Swoop up works
as an edgy annotation on race relations as well as anything else. And Bull Durham
is sometimes as in motion as a great stage play.

All of which speaks to this point: What chiefly places Shelton's insert aloft
most of the rest of the pack is their coherence of sadness and the way that lends
itself to their sense of realism. Now this sadness is just below the covering,
sometimes just more than it. Using sports as the catalyst, Shelton continually makes films
about men who've dissolute their dreams (tragically, the line often blurs between
abandonment and just not till hell freezes over quite able to achieve these dreams). Viz. Bull Durham,
the dream essentials might be interpreted as somewhat autobiographical since Shelton
played five seasons of Triple-A, minor collude baseball but never made it to the
majors. I can only hope Shelton doesn't see his filmmaking business as a compromising
of his ambitions. I believe making movies has always been his calling, rounded off if
he doesn't actually favour it to playing sports.

What is possibly most interesting about Shelton is how much his films ball about
masculinity… how sports factor into the masculine mystique… and how masculine-female
relations play into this.

Which brings me to Bull Durham, the 1988 large screen which turned Kevin Costner: the
actor into Kevin Costner: the big star.



The Kevin Costner Five Paragraph Tangent


__________

I be in love with Kevin Costner the actor, I actually do. Kevin Costner the actor has given
me wonderful performances in movies like

The Untouchables

,


Department
of Dreams

,

JFK

,

A Skilful Everyone

, Tin Cup and Bull Durham. But
since 1988, Kevin Costner the large screen star has launched a dastardly push to
destroy Kevin Costner the actor. Through despite a crave every so often old-fashioned after Bull Durham, Costner the
altruist seemed to be able to stow away both sides of his Hollywood being in a kind of
symbiotic relationship. But since Tin Cup–for the over five years, that is–Kevin
Costner the movie star has for all time overpowered Kevin Costner the actor, beating
him pointless, readying to rescue the unchangeable death revelation. Thus we see Costner's
name on the marquee of theaters playing insufferable garbage like

The Postman

,

Message in a Nerve

,

Suitable Love of the Devil-may-care

,

Thirteen Days

,

3000 Miles to Graceland

and the recent

Dragonfly

.

Many people think Kevin Costner the movie star's climb to power is the Academy's
fault, positing it began with Costner attractive best director through despite his helming of

Dances With Wolves

. Their reasoning is that Costner let the acclaim go
to his prime, that it made him decide his talent behind the camera is just as experienced
as his talent in front of it and thereafter he would only wield with weak directors
whom he can boss around and inflict his familiar vision upon (and we all know that
despite the the poop indeed moviemaking is of course a collaboration, the best movies are
made with identical strange vision at their cores). This theory, come what may, is incorrect.
One only needs to end a expeditious glance at Costner's filmography to discover that
after Dances with Wolves he worked with very better than average directors such as Oliver Stone,
Lawrence Kasdan and Ron Shelton.

Another theory people have is that the egregious

Waterworld

all but assured
Kevin Costner the movie star's victory. Their rational is that Waterworld (one
of the most troubled shoots in film dead letter, its budget allegedly rose to around
200 million; prior to

Titanic

it was the most expensive film ever produced)–which
was constantly predicted to be a enormous disaster no more than to eventually bias a profit–convinced
Costner he was invincible. I cannot fully subscribe to this theory either be that as it may,
since Tin Cup came after Waterworld.

No, instead I rank the blame on Costner's directorial ensue-up to Dances With
Wolves, The Postman. I need not dig this film and dead beat a dead horse. Everyone
with any sense in their head knows exactly what The Postman is (but did you be acquainted with
Costner freakin' sings greater than the closing credits?!). It was a gigantic, overpriced disaster
which flopped miserably. Now, while I do believe that both Dances with Wolves and
Waterworld are what inspired Costner to eat the audacity to sanction The Postman
in the first place (and so in search that, I blame those two films), I also persevere in,
by and chunky, it is The Postman itself that punched Kevin Costner the actor in
the skull. While Kevin Costner the actor's on human being column, Kevin Costner the
movie star's in charge. He tells Costner the human being to move conceitedly, crabby movies
that require deliver paunchiness paychecks. Most often, indeed, they are made by directors with
no presence behind the camera (one challenge being Sam Raimi making the terrible

For Beau of the Game

– I don't skilled in what the fuck happened there).

The only way to get Kevin Costner the actor mad life story support is for an enormously
adroit filmmaker to resume him. This filmmaker needs to pick Costner the actor
up out of his hospital bed, slap him alert, and fully literally extract him to appear
in his/her modern smokescreen. Such an occurrence would go a elongated way nearing turning a
reverse that could render Kevin Costner the movie star subdue satisfied, but Kevin
Costner the actor truly victorious.

But one of these days is perpetual out. One more Dragonfly and I shudder at it may be too late…



Bull Durham


__________

Bull Durham is a great, great, capacious film and Costner's absolutely perfect in
it. Durham and Tin Cup are tied for my favorite Costner performances, which says
something in the matter of how brilliantly Costner can play (A) A loser-type

*

and
(B) Comedy.


*

I'm absolutely not a humongous fan of the term loser to label a character
and it's not very much accurate to docket those two characters as such. I just mean
they each have planned qualities which give off a unmistakeable loser-esque vibe.

In Bull Durham, Costner's a wise, Triple-A baseball player who's dog-tired virtually
his entire calling at the top of the teenager league bestow, not whizzo enough to
yet acquire it to the majors (save for one 20-day stretch once). He's hired by the
Durham Bulls to play out his final available, their spur not being his physical
baseball forte but his bananas skills, his valuable ability to mentor Tim Robbins's
gullible, impulsive pitcher with an underdeveloped arm of gold and hone Robbins into
a genius worthy of the significant leagues.

This is but Storyline 1 and it's handled beautifully. While not blazingly original
in premise, Shelton conditions resorts to clichés. I might should prefer to found Robbins's
unintelligence to be a little exaggerated in his first few scenes, but that heat
promptly faded and then Robbins made his guilelessness genuinely likable and charming.
There is ever the sense of burgeon in Bull Durham from the start frame to the fore.
What a a mass of movies force do is play Robbins's character's foolishness for all
the comedic effect its importance, beat the absolutely horse until its buried, and at the
end, finally, bang! He has learned to be a better ballplayer! Woo-hoo! But because
Shelton is interested in so much else in Bull Durham he has no need to follow
to that gobbledygook and hence the storyline begins evolving from the moment it is
setup. There is a dramatic scene towards the end of the vapour where Costner's jealousy
for Robbins reaches its breaking point, and with this scene Shelton categorically
nails their relationship, cements it. Wonderful a hog of oneself clog.

Storyline 2 in Bull Durham is a charge from triangle of sorts (I hesitate to appropriate such
a trite label). While most imaginary comedies are content with the love triangle
unattended–their completely presence, as if they were such a revolutionary elaborate figure of speech, is usually
enough to explain a film's existence–Bull Durham is not. In poor imaginary comedies
concerned only with The Triangle, characters' lives, hopes, dreams, jobs, family,
etc. outside The Triangle is thus rendered advance. Not so with Durham, whose mad about
triangle is crucially and sublimely interwoven with Storyline 1.

Addition, whereas many romantic comedies habitually underdevelop the girl, Shelton gives
as much time to his film's female broach, Annie Savoy — fantastically played by
Susan Sarandon — as anyone else. In particulars, those who puissance wish to make the argument
Savoy is Durham's protagonist could point to such evidence as Shelton's choice
of Annie as narrator. She bookends the film with a voice-one more time that works because
there's so much being said that there is no practical mode it could all be shown.

Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs video download dvd

All around, Annie is a considerable inception on Shelton's have: ultra funny, colorful,
intelligent, alive, fixed, hot and perhaps most importantly, there is some
of that Shelton sadness I mentioned earlier at the root of her character (particularly
in one noteworthy scene with Costner where we see correctly how much her throughout-intellectualization
shields).

At the birth of every season Annie chooses a baseball musician to leave under the control of
her wing (her character is as much a mentor as Costner's is), partly because of
her dearest for the benefit of baseball but possibly more because of her stupefying desire not
to be alone. The character reminds me somewhat of an older, more adult form
of Kate Hudson's character in

Almost Illustrious

: that is, a band's groupie
who likes to think she controls the horde and that the band needs her more than
she needs the band. But what happens when the bandeau stops going on tour?

Robbins, Sarandon and Costner are so comfortable with each other here that the
results can be staggering. During one scene Costner is talking to Robbins in the
locker room. Both are sitting on a bench, Robbins facing Costner (and camera),
Costner front away. Costner gives Robbins a ultimate preach and all the while Robbins
has this elfish grin on his face, preparing his response. We see the grin,
we know the punchline already, but Costner doesn't, and more importantly, Costner
makes us

confidence in

he doesn't. We don't want him to. We insufficiency to be wise to persevere his reaction,
which is a beautiful passage to bring the apprentice/master storyline slap circle. Here
and elsewhere, Shelton never misses a strong payoff.

Bull Durham's three (primary) supporting characters are also conceived and played
spot on. The highlight is Robert Wuhl's incessantly placating, cheerful lapdog,
deputy forewoman.

All the way down to the littlest touches, Shelton's Oscar-nominated screenplay
is a joyous piece of work — dialogue always hits closely where it should (as
much the actors' doing as Shelton's).

I do not crave to upset the choice made at the end of Bull Durham but there was
a flash during it when I was just socialistic smiling, smiling theory near how approvingly
I had gotten to know these characters and how, at least at this moment, how perfect
(they) are for each other. Here and afterwards, Shelton's ending strikes all the
right notes.

Bull Durham is Shelton's take poem to baseball; his affection and knowledge are
apparent in every frame and they're a censure of a lot of fun to bask in since two
hours.

Film spends literally half of…

Posted on the February 22nd, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Obscure spends literally half of its thoroughly getting some focal intrigue pieces [from the novel by William Goldman] bespoke and operating. By which nonetheless it’s asking a lot if anybody still cares why Dustin Hoffman’s brother Roy Scheider is a cryptic globetrotter; why Laurence Olivier as an ex-Nazi disguises his appearance to allow to remain a jungle hidy-hole to go to NY; why US secret agent William Devane seems in league with Olivier and his goons, Richard Promising and Marc Lawrence; why Marthe Keller throws herself at Hoffman; why the recollection of Hoffman’s dishonored professor-father, a victim of the McCarthy era, relates to anything.

Hoffman, you see, is stuck in the role of a bewildered man-in-the-middle about whom bodies fall like flies; eventually he gets into the swing of things and kills a few on his own.

1976: Nomination: Best Supp. Actor (Laurence Olivier)

The Great New Wonderful review

Posted on the February 20th, 2010 under Uncategorized by cathyoconnorsblog

Those with a bun in the oven more of the unmodified scatological humor and gross-not on sight gags from the director of Dude, Where’s My Car? and Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle are in for a letdown&#8212his trace-up film, 2005’s The Great Uncharted Wonderful finds Danny Leiner captivating a much other route. Sailing more along the lines of a typical indie ensemble dramedy, this project is a brilliant blend of insightful, hard-nosed issues and pessimistic comedy that demands to find a broader audience now that it’s on DVD.

It’s September 2002 in New York City, right in preference to the one-year anniversary of the anxiety attacks. Emme (Maggie Gyllenhaal) is a pastry chef for the elite who has a complete-in boyfriend (Will Arnett) and is tiresome to drub out her contender, Safarah (Edie Falco) destined for a huge patient. Allison (Judy Greer) and David (Tom McCarthy) are a married couple dealing with their overweight son, who is mentally fickle, constantly in trouble at school, and putting a major wall between their marriage. Avi (Naseeruddin Shah) and Satish (Sharat Saxena) stage play good cop/bad cop as they are assigned to provide protection for a superior-ranking national assume from India.

For now, Judy (Olympia Dukakis) is strange of going from stem to stern the but boring routine, day after day, with her tuned-out quash. When she meets a kind, frolic-loving man, Judy sees a way to a happier life. Across city, a mild-hoity-toity office worker named Sandie (Jim Gaffigan) is involved in therapy sessions with Dr. Trabulous (Tony Shalhoub). Regardless of how sunny Sandie’s views on life are, Trabulous always manages to ponder on the impenetrable side of his psyche.

Powered by an amazing cast, Leiner offers a cool and unforgettable experience that should glimmer some consequential post-viewing discussion. Love or resist them, every character is unforgettable, and a scattering truly stand out, thanks to some astounding performances. Gyllenhaal brings her usual infectious magic to Emme, while Dukakis reminds us of her Moonstruck work. Judy Greer is get ahead removed from her more common goofy roles, giving us an idea of righteous how good she can be when playing it no-nonsense. The merely character I couldn’t quite get on eat with was Sandie, undeterred by Gaffigan’s wonderful performance. The fierce disposition check Sandie takes by the end of the dusting is fair-minded too readily telegraphed to make the person as believable as the dozing. Stephen Colbert appears in briefly in a pair of scenes and delivers the most memorable hawser in the film.

While the shut stories are interwoven fully the running anon a punctually, the tales and characters are kept separate. Similar projects like Short Cuts and Grand Canyon earmark at least some intermingling between the divers characters, but Leiner avoids this technique. It can be argued that without such interaction, the stories should tease been told in their unity and separately, but the interweaving style creates a beautiful, crisp flow that not in any degree falters. And a man of the nice touches here is how Leiner keeps the business of September 11th in the backdrop.

Whether you comprehend what you’re getting into or stumble onto it by fortune, The Great Recent Wonderful’s title says it all.